Skip to content

Make it yours

Tune EILISH to you

Choose where your news and gigs come from, and the genres you care about. The language follows your news country.

News from
Gigs in
Genres

Your choices are stored in a cookie on this device for up to 13 months. They aren't used for tracking or ads.

Chance the Rapper at The Metro: Consequence found the 2013 show inconsistent, not condemned

Consequence's mixed review of Chance the Rapper's 2013 Chicago show is worth revisiting for its measured doubts about the live set, Chain Smoker and Acid Rap.

· Updated · 1 min read · 1 source
Chance the Rapper
Hurstbergn / CC BY 4.0

Consequence's review of Chance the Rapper's 2013 show at The Metro in Chicago, published on 15 January 2014, is worth revisiting as a reminder that not every notice of the period was a celebration. Its verdict was mixed rather than outright negative, and it reads better as a measured piece of criticism than as a takedown. The critic is not named in the notes, so this look back relies only on the arguments the review itself made.

What the critic responded to was the gap between the records and the stage. Chance had built his profile on mixtapes with dense, layered production, and the review found the live set somewhat inconsistent. Some stretches landed and others did not, and the reviewer treated that unevenness as the central issue rather than any single failing.

The sharpest point concerned Chain Smoker. The review argued that the recorded version of the track was more transcendent than the live rendition, suggesting that the studio arrangement carried a force the performance could not quite match. It is a familiar complaint about rap shows built on intricate production, where a crowd's energy can make up for a lack of detail but rarely reproduces it.

The review also tackled the difficulty of translating Acid Rap to the stage. The album is dense and psychedelic, full of shifts in texture and mood that often work more easily on headphones than in a room full of people. Bringing that material to a live audience was, in the critic's reading, a challenge the show did not always meet, and the review framed this as a problem of translation rather than of ambition.

Crucially, the review does not condemn the concert overall. Its reservations sit alongside a broader sense that the evening had merit, and that balance is what makes the piece useful now. Read today, it offers a modest counterpoint to any assumption that Chance's live work was fully formed from the start, and a reminder that his early shows were still finding their shape.

Sources

Gig guide

Live near you

Finding gigs in your area

Open the gig guide

Keep exploring